Clinical outcomes of cardiogenic shock patients supported with VA-ECMO: Insights from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.
Publication Title
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-24-2025
Keywords
oregon; portland; cards; cards publication
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) use for cardiogenic shock (CS) is increasing worldwide despite conflicting results from randomized trials, which focused on myocardial infarction-related CS (MI-CS).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group multicenter registry to assess outcomes in CS in those supported with VA-ECMO. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD or median+IQR for normal/non-normal distributions. Group comparisons used the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for normal/non-normal data and chi-square test for proportions.
RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2023, 1,728 out of 11,244 CS patients (15.3%) received VA-ECMO. Median age was 58 years, and 69.9% were male. Etiologies of shock were heart failure (HF-CS: 45%), myocardial infarction (MI-CS; 34%), and other-CS (22%). Mortality was 51% and higher for MI-CS (60% vs 42%, MI vs HF-CS, p < 0.01). Heart replacement therapy was more common among HF-CS patients (24% vs 7%, HF vs MI-CS, p < 0.01); 71% and 43% of HF- and MI-CS underwent cardiac transplantation. VA-ECMO was placed in a non-OR site in 74% of patients, predominantly with peripheral cannulation (71%). Distal perfusion catheters were used in 34% of VA-ECMO cases. In 71% of patients >1 MCS device was used during hospitalization. Complications included acute limb ischemia (14% overall, 10% vs 17%, HF vs MI-CS, p < 0.01), bleeding (53% overall, 47% vs 56%, HF vs MI-CS, p < 0.01), and stroke (13% overall, 10% vs 16%, HF vs MI-CS, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Using a large contemporary real-world CS registry, we report high mortality and complication rates with VA-ECMO. These findings may inform future shock trial designs.
Area of Special Interest
Cardiovascular (Heart)
Specialty/Research Institute
Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science (CARDS)
Specialty/Research Institute
Cardiology
Specialty/Research Institute
Critical Care Medicine
DOI
10.1016/j.healun.2025.07.016
