Development of a Novel Cervical Deformity Surgical Invasiveness Index.
Publication Title
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-29-2019
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a novel surgical invasiveness index for cervical deformity (CD) surgery that incorporates CD-specific parameters.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a surgical invasiveness index for general spine surgery and adult spinal deformity, but a CD index has not been developed.
METHODS: CD was defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7 Cobb > 10°, cervical lordosis (CL) > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, chin brow vertical angle (CBVA) > 25°. Consensus from experienced spine and neurosurgeons selected weightings for each variable that went into the invasiveness index. Binary logistic regression predicted high operative time (>338 minutes), estimated blood loss (EBL) (>600 cc), or length of stay (LOS; > 5 days) based on the median values of operative time, EBL and LOS. Multivariable regression modeling was utilized to construct a final model incorporating the strongest combination of factors to predict operative time, LOS, and EBL.
RESULTS: 85 CD patients were included (61yrs, 66%F). The variables in the newly developed CD invasiveness index with their corresponding weightings were: history of prior cervical surgery (3), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (2/level), corpectomy (4/level), levels fused (1/level), implants (1/level), posterior decompression (2/level), Smith-Peterson osteotomy (2/level), three column osteotomy (8/level), fusion to upper cervical spine (2), absolute change in T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL), cSVA, T4-T12 thoracic kyphosis and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) from baseline to 1-year. The newly developed CD-specific invasiveness index strongly predicted long LOS (R = 0.310, p < 0.001), high EBL (R = 0.170, p = 0.011), and extended operative time (R = 0.207, p = 0.031). A second analysis used multivariable regression modeling to determine which combination of factors in the newly developed index were the strongest determinants of operative time, LOS, and EBL. The final predictive model included: number of corpectomies, levels fused, decompression, combined approach, and absolute changes in SVA, cSVA and TK. This model predicted EBL (R = 0.26), operative time (R = 0.12), and LOS (R = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Extended length of stay, operative time, and high blood loss were strongly predicted by the newly developed CD invasiveness index, incorporating surgical factors and radiographic parameters clinically relevant for patients undergoing cervical deformity corrective surgery.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Area of Special Interest
Neurosciences (Brain & Spine)
Specialty/Research Institute
Surgery
Specialty/Research Institute
Orthopedics
