2166 / 8 - Analysis of ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) for predicting response to amivantamab and lazertinib among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after progression on osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy (CHRYSALIS-2 Cohort A)

Document Type

Abstract

Publication Date

4-17-2023

Publication Title

AACR Annual Meeting 2023

Keywords

oregon; chiles; genomics

Abstract

Background: Among post-osimertinib (osi), chemotherapy-naïve patients (pts) treated with amivantamab (ami) and lazertinib (laz) in CHRYSALIS Cohort E, NGS of baseline ctDNA and tumor tissue revealed pts with identified EGFR/MET-based resistance (eg, EGFR C797S or MET amplification) were slightly more likely to respond versus those without EGFR/MET-based resistance (ORR=47% vs 29%), but about half of responders had unknown resistance mechanisms (Bauml JCO 2021; 39:15_suppl, 9006). In CHRYSALIS-2 Cohort A (NCT04077463), ami + laz demonstrated an ORR of 33% in the post-osi and platinum-based chemotherapy population (Shu JCO 2022; 40:16_suppl, 9006). This analysis investigated whether EGFR/MET-dependent resistance by ctDNA correlated with response.
Methods: Cohort A examined ami + laz in EGFR exon19del or L858R mutated advanced NSCLC whose disease progressed on osi as well as platinum-based chemotherapy. ORR was verified through blinded independent central review. Plasma samples were collected prior to treatment; ctDNA was analyzed by Guardant360.
Results: A total of 162 pts were enrolled; of these, 110 (68%) had analyzable ctDNA data, with most common mutations observed in EGFR and TP53. Twenty-eight (25%) pts had resistance categorized as EGFR/MET-dependent and 31 (28%) as EGFR/MET-independent; no genetic resistance mechanism was identified in 51 (46%). The ORR
was 29% and 26% in EGFR/MET-dependent and independent pts, respectively. ORR in pts with an unknown resistance mechanism was 39% (Table).
Conclusions: Among pts who progressed on osi and platinum-based chemotherapy, genetic profiling of osi resistance by ctDNA did not predict response, with many responders having unknown resistance mechanisms. These results suggest alternative biomarker approaches are needed to identify pts most likely to benefit from ami + laz.

Table. ORR by type of resistance mechanism Resistance mechanism n PR ORRa EGFR/MET-dependentb 28 8 29% EGFR/MET-independent 31 8 26% Unknown 51 20 39% All patients 110 36 33% aResponses were assessed by blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. bIncludes co-occurring ‘independent’ resistance mechanisms. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MET, mesenchymal epithelial transition factor; ORR, objective response rate; PR, partial response.

Clinical Institute

Cancer

Department

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute

Department

Oncology

Comments

Rachel E. Sanborn1, Saiama N. Waqar2, Byoung Chul Cho3, Benjamin Besse4, Koichi Goto5, Yongsheng Wang6, Se-Hoon Lee7, Melina E. Marmarelis8, Yuichiro Ohe9, Dong-Wan Kim10, Antonio Calles11, Joel Neal12, Christina S. Baik13, Pasi A. Janne14, Joshua C. Curtin15, Bharvin Patel15, Mike Gormley15, S. Martin Shreeve15, Joshua M. Bauml15, Roland E. Knoblauch15, James Chih-Hsin Yang16

Link to Full Text


Share

COinS