Identifying patients with opioid use disorder using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes: Challenges and opportunities.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-15-2023

Publication Title

Addiction (Abingdon, England)

Keywords

washington; colville; ICD codes; International Classification of Diseases; OUD; opioid abuse; opioid dependence; opioid use; opioid use disorder; primary care; rural

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes are often used in research to identify patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), but their accuracy for this purpose is not fully evaluated. This study describes application of ICD-10 diagnosis codes for opioid use, dependence and abuse from an electronic health record (EHR) data extraction using data from the clinics' OUD patient registries and clinician/staff EHR entries.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING: Four rural primary care clinics in Washington and Idaho, USA.

PARTICIPANTS: 307 patients.

MEASUREMENTS: This study used three data sources from each clinic: (1) a limited dataset extracted from the EHR, (2) a clinic-based registry of patients with OUD and (3) the clinician/staff interface of the EHR (e.g. progress notes, problem list). Data source one included records with six commonly applied ICD-10 codes for opioid use, dependence and abuse: F11.10 (opioid abuse, uncomplicated), F11.20 (opioid dependence, uncomplicated), F11.21 (opioid dependence, in remission), F11.23 (opioid dependence with withdrawal), F11.90 (opioid use, unspecified, uncomplicated) and F11.99 (opioid use, unspecified with unspecified opioid-induced disorder). Care coordinators used data sources two and three to categorize each patient identified in data source one: (1) confirmed OUD diagnosis, (2) may have OUD but no confirmed OUD diagnosis, (3) chronic pain with no evidence of OUD and (4) no evidence for OUD or chronic pain.

FINDINGS: F11.10, F11.21 and F11.99 were applied most frequently to patients who had clinical diagnoses of OUD (64%, 89% and 79%, respectively). F11.20, F11.23 and F11.90 were applied to patients who had a diagnostic mix of OUD and chronic pain without OUD. The four clinics applied codes inconsistently.

CONCLUSIONS: Lack of uniform application of ICD diagnosis codes make it challenging to use diagnosis code data from EHR to identify a research population of persons with opioid use disorder.

Clinical Institute

Mental Health

Department

Behavioral Health

Department

Primary Care

Link to Full Text

PSJH Full Text

Share

COinS