Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-9-2023
Publication Title
Journal of cardiac failure
Keywords
Cardiogenic shock; acute myocardial infarction; heart failure; transfer; oregon; portland; cards; cards publication
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consensus recommendations for cardiogenic shock (CS) advise transfer of patients in need of advanced options beyond the capability of "spoke" centers to tertiary/"hub" centers with higher capabilities. However, outcomes associated with such transfers are largely unknown beyond those reported in individual health networks.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze a contemporary, multicenter CS cohort with the aim of comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients between transfer (between spoke and hub centers) and nontransfer cohorts (those primarily admitted to a hub center) for both acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and heart failure-related HF-CS. We also aim to identify clinical characteristics of the transfer cohort that are associated with in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry is a national, multicenter, prospective registry including high-volume (mostly hub) CS centers. Fifteen U.S. sites contributed data for this analysis from 2016-2020.
RESULTS: Of 1890 consecutive CS patients enrolled into the CSWG registry, 1028 (54.4%) patients were transferred. Of these patients, 528 (58.1%) had heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and 381 (41.9%) had CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Upon arrival to the CSWG site, transfer patients were more likely to be in SCAI stages C and D, when compared to nontransfer patients. Transfer patients had higher mortality rates (37% vs 29%, < 0.001) than nontransfer patients; the differences were driven primarily by the HF-CS cohort. Logistic regression identified increasing age, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and higher number of vasoactive drugs prior to or within 24 hours after CSWG site transfer as independent predictors of mortality among HF-CS patients. Conversely, pulmonary artery catheter use prior to transfer or within 24 hours of arrival was associated with decreased mortality rates. Among transfer AMI-CS patients, BMI > 28 kg/m
CONCLUSION: More than half of patients with CS managed at high-volume CS centers were transferred from another hospital. Although transfer patients had higher mortality rates than those who were admitted primarily to hub centers, the outcomes and their predictors varied significantly when classified by HF-CS vs AMI-CS.
Clinical Institute
Cardiovascular (Heart)
Department
Cardiology
Recommended Citation
Garan, A Reshad; Kataria, Rachna; Li, Borui; Sinha, Shashank; Kanwar, Manreet K; Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime; Li, Song; Ton, VAN-Khue; Blumer, Vanessa; Grandin, E Wilson; Harwani, Neil; Zazzali, Peter; Walec, Karol D; Hickey, Gavin; Abraham, Jacob; Mahr, Claudius; Nathan, Sandeep; Vorovich, Esther; Guglin, Maya; Hall, Shelley; Khalife, Wissam; Sangal, Paavni; Zhang, Yijing; Kim, Ju H; Schwartzman, Andrew; Vishnevsky, Alec; Burkhoff, Daniel; and Kapur, Navin K, "Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis." (2023). Articles, Abstracts, and Reports. 7991.
https://digitalcommons.providence.org/publications/7991
